<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 394 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333374</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, Salcomp India, regarding the determination of Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) for imports and the appropriate interest rate for External Commercial Borrowing (ECB). The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s arguments, emphasizing consistency in proceedings and adherence to accepted benchmarking practices such as the LIBOR rate. The order was pronounced on 31st August 2016 in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 17:08:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 394 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333374</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, Salcomp India, regarding the determination of Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) for imports and the appropriate interest rate for External Commercial Borrowing (ECB). The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s arguments, emphasizing consistency in proceedings and adherence to accepted benchmarking practices such as the LIBOR rate. The order was pronounced on 31st August 2016 in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>