<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 392 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333372</link>
    <description>The judgment directs appellants&#039; counsels to take fresh steps for listing, comply with court orders, ensure service of notices, and pay deficit court fees promptly. Failure to adhere to these directives may lead to further actions by the court. The decision underscores the necessity of active engagement, adherence to procedural requirements, proper service, and timely financial compliance to facilitate the resolution of legal matters efficiently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:25:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 392 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333372</link>
      <description>The judgment directs appellants&#039; counsels to take fresh steps for listing, comply with court orders, ensure service of notices, and pay deficit court fees promptly. Failure to adhere to these directives may lead to further actions by the court. The decision underscores the necessity of active engagement, adherence to procedural requirements, proper service, and timely financial compliance to facilitate the resolution of legal matters efficiently.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>