https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333367 The Court dismissed the appeal, citing no substantial question of law for interference under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The medical certificate's validity was questioned due to the doctor's specialization, lack of treatment details, and timing of issuance. The delay in filing the appeal was not condoned as the Managing Director's ill-health was deemed insufficient cause. The appeal was dismissed without costs awarded. en-us Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2016 18:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333367 The Court dismissed the appeal, citing no substantial question of law for interference under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The medical certificate's validity was questioned due to the doctor's specialization, lack of treatment details, and timing of issuance. The delay in filing the appeal was not condoned as the Managing Director's ill-health was deemed insufficient cause. The appeal was dismissed without costs awarded. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333367