<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (1) TMI 286 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187163</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the orders of the Division Bench and the learned Single Judge, directing parties to revert to the position as of September 15, 1988. Somani Builders were ordered to vacate the premises within one month. The Single Judge was instructed to handle the contempt application within contempt jurisdiction. The appeal was allowed with costs to be shared equally by Respondents 1 and 2.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:08:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (1) TMI 286 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187163</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the orders of the Division Bench and the learned Single Judge, directing parties to revert to the position as of September 15, 1988. Somani Builders were ordered to vacate the premises within one month. The Single Judge was instructed to handle the contempt application within contempt jurisdiction. The appeal was allowed with costs to be shared equally by Respondents 1 and 2.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>