https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187159 In a second appeal concerning a single and indivisible decree, failure to bring the legal representatives of deceased respondents on record caused the appeal to abate against them. Because any merits decision against the surviving respondents would risk inconsistent decrees where the rights of the deceased respondents had already become final, the appeal could not proceed in a fragmented manner. The appeal therefore abated as against all respondents and was not maintainable on the merits. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:26:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187159 In a second appeal concerning a single and indivisible decree, failure to bring the legal representatives of deceased respondents on record caused the appeal to abate against them. Because any merits decision against the surviving respondents would risk inconsistent decrees where the rights of the deceased respondents had already become final, the appeal could not proceed in a fragmented manner. The appeal therefore abated as against all respondents and was not maintainable on the merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187159