https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187158 The Supreme Court interpreted paragraph 7.3 of the Scheme for Appointments to General Managers in Indian Railways, holding that residual service of at least two years should be reckoned from the date of vacancy accrual. It emphasized fairness and transparency to avoid undue delays. The Court found no violation of constitutional guarantees under Articles 14 and 16, as appointments adhered to correct interpretation of paragraph 7.3. It also ruled out discrimination in considering inter se seniority and relaxation under paragraph 10 of the Scheme. The Court set aside decisions of the Central Administrative Tribunal, directing review of bypassed cases and granting notional promotion if needed, with no costs imposed. en-us Mon, 29 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:26:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187158 The Supreme Court interpreted paragraph 7.3 of the Scheme for Appointments to General Managers in Indian Railways, holding that residual service of at least two years should be reckoned from the date of vacancy accrual. It emphasized fairness and transparency to avoid undue delays. The Court found no violation of constitutional guarantees under Articles 14 and 16, as appointments adhered to correct interpretation of paragraph 7.3. It also ruled out discrimination in considering inter se seniority and relaxation under paragraph 10 of the Scheme. The Court set aside decisions of the Central Administrative Tribunal, directing review of bypassed cases and granting notional promotion if needed, with no costs imposed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187158