<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1069 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187136</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision in favor of the respondent partnership firm accused of fraudulently availing cenvat credit without receiving raw materials. The Tribunal found that the respondent maintained proper cenvat records and utilized the credit for finished products, while the buyers&#039; incomplete details hindered accurate assessment. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the respondent&#039;s cross objection was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:47:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1069 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187136</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision in favor of the respondent partnership firm accused of fraudulently availing cenvat credit without receiving raw materials. The Tribunal found that the respondent maintained proper cenvat records and utilized the credit for finished products, while the buyers&#039; incomplete details hindered accurate assessment. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the respondent&#039;s cross objection was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>