https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187149 The Court allowed the petitioner, a vanaspati manufacturer, to utilize accumulated benefits under a scheme to pay duty under a subsequent scheme, following the precedent set in a previous case involving vanaspati manufacturers. The impugned order denying the petitioner's claim was set aside, emphasizing the entitlement of manufacturers to adjust money credit accrued earlier towards duty payable for a subsequent period. The Court disposed of the writ petition in favor of the petitioner, with no costs awarded. en-us Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:47:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187149 The Court allowed the petitioner, a vanaspati manufacturer, to utilize accumulated benefits under a scheme to pay duty under a subsequent scheme, following the precedent set in a previous case involving vanaspati manufacturers. The impugned order denying the petitioner's claim was set aside, emphasizing the entitlement of manufacturers to adjust money credit accrued earlier towards duty payable for a subsequent period. The Court disposed of the writ petition in favor of the petitioner, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187149