https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187111 Judicial interference with disciplinary action at the threshold is justified only where the record discloses cogent material showing a real likelihood of bias or mala fide motive. Bare suspicion, allegations of vendetta, political sensitivity, or procedural haste are insufficient without concrete evidence of ill will or improper purpose. Applying that standard, the Court found that the sequence of CBI references, withdrawal of notifications, and later charge-sheet did not establish a legally sustainable case of mala fides against the officer, and the initiation of proceedings could not be struck down merely because the allegations were serious. en-us Thu, 30 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187111 Judicial interference with disciplinary action at the threshold is justified only where the record discloses cogent material showing a real likelihood of bias or mala fide motive. Bare suspicion, allegations of vendetta, political sensitivity, or procedural haste are insufficient without concrete evidence of ill will or improper purpose. Applying that standard, the Court found that the sequence of CBI references, withdrawal of notifications, and later charge-sheet did not establish a legally sustainable case of mala fides against the officer, and the initiation of proceedings could not be struck down merely because the allegations were serious. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187111