https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187110 In a registration dispute, the Supreme Court accepted that the High Court could direct a fact-finding enquiry in writ jurisdiction even though the Registration Act, 1908 does not expressly provide for such an exercise, and the finding concerning the respondent's deed was left undisturbed. It further held that where the genuineness of competing sale deeds is in issue, fairness requires an independent examination of each document. Because the appellant's deed had not been examined on merits and the complaint officer had already formed an adverse view, a separate enquiry by a different authority was directed. The matter was remitted to the Inspector General of Registration for that limited purpose. en-us Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:38:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187110 In a registration dispute, the Supreme Court accepted that the High Court could direct a fact-finding enquiry in writ jurisdiction even though the Registration Act, 1908 does not expressly provide for such an exercise, and the finding concerning the respondent's deed was left undisturbed. It further held that where the genuineness of competing sale deeds is in issue, fairness requires an independent examination of each document. Because the appellant's deed had not been examined on merits and the complaint officer had already formed an adverse view, a separate enquiry by a different authority was directed. The matter was remitted to the Inspector General of Registration for that limited purpose. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187110