<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 667 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187109</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the HC&#039;s judgment due to its contradictory and confusing conclusions. The SC found that the disciplinary proceedings were vitiated due to lack of reasonable opportunity and access to documents for the respondent. The suspension order was deemed unsustainable, and the respondent was treated as on duty for the suspension period, with arrears to be paid. However, the SC set aside the HC&#039;s award of damages for harassment and loss of reputation, finding no clear basis for such damages, and issued no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 667 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187109</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the HC&#039;s judgment due to its contradictory and confusing conclusions. The SC found that the disciplinary proceedings were vitiated due to lack of reasonable opportunity and access to documents for the respondent. The suspension order was deemed unsustainable, and the respondent was treated as on duty for the suspension period, with arrears to be paid. However, the SC set aside the HC&#039;s award of damages for harassment and loss of reputation, finding no clear basis for such damages, and issued no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>