<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5348</link>
    <description>A valid partnership may exist between the karta of a Hindu undivided family and a coparcener who joins as a working partner by contributing only skill and labour. Partnership law permits persons to agree to share profits of a business carried on by all or any of them acting for all, and there is no legal bar merely because one participant is a coparcener. Skill and labour were treated as a real and valuable contribution, and as the separate asset of the individual coparcener rather than property of the family. The arrangement was not shown to be fictitious or otherwise invalid, so the partnership was upheld as genuine and legally effective.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5348</link>
      <description>A valid partnership may exist between the karta of a Hindu undivided family and a coparcener who joins as a working partner by contributing only skill and labour. Partnership law permits persons to agree to share profits of a business carried on by all or any of them acting for all, and there is no legal bar merely because one participant is a coparcener. Skill and labour were treated as a real and valuable contribution, and as the separate asset of the individual coparcener rather than property of the family. The arrangement was not shown to be fictitious or otherwise invalid, so the partnership was upheld as genuine and legally effective.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>