<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 354 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333334</link>
    <description>The High Court held that electrical installations qualify as &quot;Plant and Machinery&quot; for depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, in line with a Division Bench judgment and Supreme Court precedents. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, upholding the treatment of electrical installations as depreciable assets, leading to the appeal being decided in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2016 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 354 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333334</link>
      <description>The High Court held that electrical installations qualify as &quot;Plant and Machinery&quot; for depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, in line with a Division Bench judgment and Supreme Court precedents. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, upholding the treatment of electrical installations as depreciable assets, leading to the appeal being decided in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>