https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187101 Eviction of a tenant from an ordinary non-residential building under section 10(3)(a)(iii) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 requires proof of bona fide requirement as part of the landlord's case. The provision was construed harmoniously with the rent control scheme, which is intended to prevent unreasonable eviction, and the absence of express words on requirement in section 10(3)(a)(iii) did not exclude that element. The interpretive approach avoided an absurd result by reading the requirement of genuine need into the clause, so a landlord cannot secure eviction by proving only the bare factual ingredients. en-us Tue, 29 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Oct 2016 13:14:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187101 Eviction of a tenant from an ordinary non-residential building under section 10(3)(a)(iii) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 requires proof of bona fide requirement as part of the landlord's case. The provision was construed harmoniously with the rent control scheme, which is intended to prevent unreasonable eviction, and the absence of express words on requirement in section 10(3)(a)(iii) did not exclude that element. The interpretive approach avoided an absurd result by reading the requirement of genuine need into the clause, so a landlord cannot secure eviction by proving only the bare factual ingredients. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187101