<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 655 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187098</link>
    <description>Tender conditions on earnest money are ordinarily matters of contract and are not open to judicial alteration unless they are arbitrary, discriminatory or mala fide; the exemption for Government organisations and public sector undertakings was treated as having a rational basis, so relaxing the deposit requirement was unjustified. A power-trading contract could not be awarded on price alone where the bidder lacked the mandatory licence for the volume of power involved; the higher bid did not create any entitlement to the contract. The challenge to the tender terms and the claim for award therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 655 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187098</link>
      <description>Tender conditions on earnest money are ordinarily matters of contract and are not open to judicial alteration unless they are arbitrary, discriminatory or mala fide; the exemption for Government organisations and public sector undertakings was treated as having a rational basis, so relaxing the deposit requirement was unjustified. A power-trading contract could not be awarded on price alone where the bidder lacked the mandatory licence for the volume of power involved; the higher bid did not create any entitlement to the contract. The challenge to the tender terms and the claim for award therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>