<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1129 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187097</link>
    <description>Writ interference with confiscation of an imported machine was declined where customs authorities found non-compliance with the conditions of an exemption notification. The import had been cleared under the exemption, but adjudication after remand again ordered confiscation with an option to pay fine and penalty, and the appellate authority affirmed that view. The Court held that the factual findings recorded on the material before the statutory authorities disclosed no irregularity or illegality warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. The confiscation order and the appellate order were therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1129 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187097</link>
      <description>Writ interference with confiscation of an imported machine was declined where customs authorities found non-compliance with the conditions of an exemption notification. The import had been cleared under the exemption, but adjudication after remand again ordered confiscation with an option to pay fine and penalty, and the appellate authority affirmed that view. The Court held that the factual findings recorded on the material before the statutory authorities disclosed no irregularity or illegality warranting interference in writ jurisdiction. The confiscation order and the appellate order were therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>