https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333319 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI, in a judgment by Mr. M.V. Ravindran and Mr. C.J. Mathew, dismissed an appeal due to a 17-year delay in filing caused by the appellant's pursuit of remedies through the Settlement Commission and High Court. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant's failure to engage with the Central Excise Officer and upheld the Settlement Commission's order affirmed by the High Court. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay was dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and highlighting the importance of exhausting available remedies before resorting to appellate avenues. en-us Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Nov 2017 14:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333319 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI, in a judgment by Mr. M.V. Ravindran and Mr. C.J. Mathew, dismissed an appeal due to a 17-year delay in filing caused by the appellant's pursuit of remedies through the Settlement Commission and High Court. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant's failure to engage with the Central Excise Officer and upheld the Settlement Commission's order affirmed by the High Court. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay was dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and highlighting the importance of exhausting available remedies before resorting to appellate avenues. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333319