<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1575 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187094</link>
    <description>A credit society that provides facilities only to its members is not treated as a co-operative bank unless it satisfies the statutory attributes of a primary co-operative bank under the Banking Regulation Act, including banking as its principal business, the prescribed share capital and reserves, and bye-laws excluding admission of another co-operative society as a member. On the recorded facts, the assessee was registered only as a co-operative society, not as a bank, and the authorities found no lending or credit activity to non-members. The Court found no perversity or misreading in those concurrent findings and held that no substantial question of law arose; the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) was therefore available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:00:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1575 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187094</link>
      <description>A credit society that provides facilities only to its members is not treated as a co-operative bank unless it satisfies the statutory attributes of a primary co-operative bank under the Banking Regulation Act, including banking as its principal business, the prescribed share capital and reserves, and bye-laws excluding admission of another co-operative society as a member. On the recorded facts, the assessee was registered only as a co-operative society, not as a bank, and the authorities found no lending or credit activity to non-members. The Court found no perversity or misreading in those concurrent findings and held that no substantial question of law arose; the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) was therefore available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>