<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 332 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333312</link>
    <description>The Revenue appeal was held to fall within the monetary threshold prescribed under CBEC instructions issued under Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the Tribunal applied the Board&#039;s clarification that the enhanced limit extends to pending appeals. On that basis, and consistent with judicial support for applying litigation policy limits to matters already filed, the appeal was dismissed. The stay application was also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 332 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333312</link>
      <description>The Revenue appeal was held to fall within the monetary threshold prescribed under CBEC instructions issued under Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the Tribunal applied the Board&#039;s clarification that the enhanced limit extends to pending appeals. On that basis, and consistent with judicial support for applying litigation policy limits to matters already filed, the appeal was dismissed. The stay application was also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>