<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1143 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187085</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) to delete the disallowance of capital loss amounting to &amp;amp;8377; 15,29,049/- for the assessment year 2004-05. The Tribunal found the disallowance lacked concrete evidence of non-genuineness and failed to establish connivance between the appellant and brokers. Relying on factual findings and legal precedents, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the capital loss was genuine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:17:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1143 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187085</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) to delete the disallowance of capital loss amounting to &amp;amp;8377; 15,29,049/- for the assessment year 2004-05. The Tribunal found the disallowance lacked concrete evidence of non-genuineness and failed to establish connivance between the appellant and brokers. Relying on factual findings and legal precedents, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the capital loss was genuine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>