<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 321 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333301</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of unexplained cash credits under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the restriction of depreciation on machinery to 50% due to its limited use during the relevant year. The matter of unexplained cash credits was sent back to the Assessing Officer for further investigation. The decision was made on August 12, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2016 14:41:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 321 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333301</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of unexplained cash credits under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the restriction of depreciation on machinery to 50% due to its limited use during the relevant year. The matter of unexplained cash credits was sent back to the Assessing Officer for further investigation. The decision was made on August 12, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>