<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 299 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333279</link>
    <description>Inputs received under job work challans and fitted into the final product were held not includible in the assessable value for central excise duty, because the duty liability on the final product was not shown to have been avoided on the footing that the inputs were received otherwise than for job work. The valuation issue was treated as settled against inclusion by binding precedent directly covering the point, so the demand and penalties were not sustainable. The appeal succeeded and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2016 13:10:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 299 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333279</link>
      <description>Inputs received under job work challans and fitted into the final product were held not includible in the assessable value for central excise duty, because the duty liability on the final product was not shown to have been avoided on the footing that the inputs were received otherwise than for job work. The valuation issue was treated as settled against inclusion by binding precedent directly covering the point, so the demand and penalties were not sustainable. The appeal succeeded and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>