<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 290 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333270</link>
    <description>IMFL and rectified spirit were treated as not liable to commercial tax or VAT for the period before 01.04.2013, because the governing entry in Schedule-I of the M.P. VAT Act had not yet been amended. The Court followed its earlier view on similar excisable goods and applied the principle that, for the pre-amendment period, recovery of commercial tax or VAT on such goods was not permissible. The impugned assessment and connected proceedings were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 290 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333270</link>
      <description>IMFL and rectified spirit were treated as not liable to commercial tax or VAT for the period before 01.04.2013, because the governing entry in Schedule-I of the M.P. VAT Act had not yet been amended. The Court followed its earlier view on similar excisable goods and applied the principle that, for the pre-amendment period, recovery of commercial tax or VAT on such goods was not permissible. The impugned assessment and connected proceedings were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>