<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 282 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333262</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal was bound to succeed as the appellants were eligible for a refund based on previous decisions and principles established by the High Court of Gujarat. Consequential relief was granted to the appellants, emphasizing the binding effect of earlier Tribunal decisions in favor of the appellants and the importance of judicial comity and consistency in decision-making for the same assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 282 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333262</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal was bound to succeed as the appellants were eligible for a refund based on previous decisions and principles established by the High Court of Gujarat. Consequential relief was granted to the appellants, emphasizing the binding effect of earlier Tribunal decisions in favor of the appellants and the importance of judicial comity and consistency in decision-making for the same assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>