<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 280 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333260</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions regarding the valuation and inclusion of specific amounts in the taxable value. The matter was remanded to the Original Authority for re-adjudication, considering the evidence provided by the appellant. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, ensuring a fair opportunity for the appellant to present their case, and the stay application was also disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 21:49:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 280 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333260</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions regarding the valuation and inclusion of specific amounts in the taxable value. The matter was remanded to the Original Authority for re-adjudication, considering the evidence provided by the appellant. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, ensuring a fair opportunity for the appellant to present their case, and the stay application was also disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>