<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 277 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333257</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court granted special leave to appeal limited to the question of penalty in a case involving duty demands and penalty imposition under the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal had reduced the penalty to Rs. 20 lakhs, contrary to the appellant&#039;s argument that the penalty should be equal to the duty determined. The Court agreed with the appellant, ruling that the penalty should indeed be equal to the duty determined. Consequently, the respondent was directed to pay a penalty of Rs. 40,44,720, with the already paid Rs. 20 lakh to be adjusted, and the balance to be paid within two months. The appeal was disposed of with strict adherence to Section 11AC of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 11:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 277 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333257</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court granted special leave to appeal limited to the question of penalty in a case involving duty demands and penalty imposition under the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal had reduced the penalty to Rs. 20 lakhs, contrary to the appellant&#039;s argument that the penalty should be equal to the duty determined. The Court agreed with the appellant, ruling that the penalty should indeed be equal to the duty determined. Consequently, the respondent was directed to pay a penalty of Rs. 40,44,720, with the already paid Rs. 20 lakh to be adjusted, and the balance to be paid within two months. The appeal was disposed of with strict adherence to Section 11AC of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>