<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 274 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333254</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the activities of processing TMT coils into TMT bars/rods, including de-coiling, straightening, and cutting, do not amount to manufacturing. The end product retains the original identity of the raw material, and no new, distinct article emerges. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision based on the definition of manufacturing and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 274 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333254</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the activities of processing TMT coils into TMT bars/rods, including de-coiling, straightening, and cutting, do not amount to manufacturing. The end product retains the original identity of the raw material, and no new, distinct article emerges. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision based on the definition of manufacturing and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>