https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333249 The Tribunal upheld the demand for the differential duty on exported goods, but set aside the penalty. The Court ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that no duty was payable on the exported goods, and any duty paid was refundable. The demand for the differential duty was deemed unnecessary and unjustified. The appeals were disposed of in favor of the appellant, with the Court finding in their favor on all substantial questions of law. en-us Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2017 13:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333249 The Tribunal upheld the demand for the differential duty on exported goods, but set aside the penalty. The Court ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that no duty was payable on the exported goods, and any duty paid was refundable. The demand for the differential duty was deemed unnecessary and unjustified. The appeals were disposed of in favor of the appellant, with the Court finding in their favor on all substantial questions of law. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333249