https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333248 The Court dismissed the review application, finding that the issues raised had already been addressed in the original judgment. Emphasizing the limited scope of review proceedings, the Court highlighted that such processes are not for re-arguing cases but are confined to specific grounds like mistakes apparent on the record. The judgment underscored the importance of adhering to the prescribed scope of review and clarified that it is not a substitute for an appeal but a mechanism to rectify clear errors in the record. en-us Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Oct 2016 19:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333248 The Court dismissed the review application, finding that the issues raised had already been addressed in the original judgment. Emphasizing the limited scope of review proceedings, the Court highlighted that such processes are not for re-arguing cases but are confined to specific grounds like mistakes apparent on the record. The judgment underscored the importance of adhering to the prescribed scope of review and clarified that it is not a substitute for an appeal but a mechanism to rectify clear errors in the record. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333248