<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 267 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333247</link>
    <description>The court declined to quash the show cause notice challenging the country of origin of imported PVC Flex Banners but granted the petitioner 30 days to file a reply. The court emphasized the importance of addressing the authenticity of certificates and procedural compliance by the Adjudicating Authority. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to prioritize the validity of the certificates for fair adjudication, allowing the petitioner a chance to present their case. The court disposed of the Writ Petition without costs, emphasizing the need for a thorough adjudication process and granting the petitioner a fair opportunity to address the raised issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 19:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 267 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333247</link>
      <description>The court declined to quash the show cause notice challenging the country of origin of imported PVC Flex Banners but granted the petitioner 30 days to file a reply. The court emphasized the importance of addressing the authenticity of certificates and procedural compliance by the Adjudicating Authority. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to prioritize the validity of the certificates for fair adjudication, allowing the petitioner a chance to present their case. The court disposed of the Writ Petition without costs, emphasizing the need for a thorough adjudication process and granting the petitioner a fair opportunity to address the raised issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>