<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 264 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333244</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals and upheld the decision of the Customs Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in a case involving alleged fraudulent exports of low-quality garments. The Court found that the Department of Revenue Intelligence failed to prove the allegations of flow back of remittances and over-invoicing, stating that the invoices raised were verified during exports and the entire amount reflected in the invoices was received by the respondents. The Court emphasized the importance of factual findings and the burden of proof in cases of alleged fraudulent activities, requiring substantial evidence to substantiate claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 264 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333244</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals and upheld the decision of the Customs Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in a case involving alleged fraudulent exports of low-quality garments. The Court found that the Department of Revenue Intelligence failed to prove the allegations of flow back of remittances and over-invoicing, stating that the invoices raised were verified during exports and the entire amount reflected in the invoices was received by the respondents. The Court emphasized the importance of factual findings and the burden of proof in cases of alleged fraudulent activities, requiring substantial evidence to substantiate claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>