<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 261 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333241</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s claims regarding sales return, cash discount, and return of stock transferred goods in the revised assessment order. The respondent was directed to redo the assessment on these aspects after providing the petitioner with a personal hearing, emphasizing that if the petitioner is legally entitled to any relief, it should be duly considered. No costs were awarded in this judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 19:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 261 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333241</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s claims regarding sales return, cash discount, and return of stock transferred goods in the revised assessment order. The respondent was directed to redo the assessment on these aspects after providing the petitioner with a personal hearing, emphasizing that if the petitioner is legally entitled to any relief, it should be duly considered. No costs were awarded in this judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>