<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 260 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333240</link>
    <description>The court allowed the revision, setting aside the orders of the assessing authority, first appellate authority, and the Tribunal. It ruled that no recoveries could be executed against the revisionist personally, but the department could pursue assets of the company in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2016 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 260 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333240</link>
      <description>The court allowed the revision, setting aside the orders of the assessing authority, first appellate authority, and the Tribunal. It ruled that no recoveries could be executed against the revisionist personally, but the department could pursue assets of the company in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>