<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 898 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187067</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to sustain the addition of Rs. 2 lakhs as unexplained cash credit in the assessment year 2005-06. The appellant failed to sufficiently prove the creditworthiness and genuineness of the loan transaction, as required under section 68 of the Income-tax Act. The appeal was dismissed on 14.5.2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 18:34:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 898 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187067</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to sustain the addition of Rs. 2 lakhs as unexplained cash credit in the assessment year 2005-06. The appellant failed to sufficiently prove the creditworthiness and genuineness of the loan transaction, as required under section 68 of the Income-tax Act. The appeal was dismissed on 14.5.2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>