<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 253 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333233</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to issue the show cause notice and determine the correct status of the appellant as either a partnership firm or an Association of Persons (AOP). The appellant was directed to submit its reply to the show cause notice, and the Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to pass orders within six weeks. The court emphasized the appellant&#039;s cooperation in the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 253 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333233</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to issue the show cause notice and determine the correct status of the appellant as either a partnership firm or an Association of Persons (AOP). The appellant was directed to submit its reply to the show cause notice, and the Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to pass orders within six weeks. The court emphasized the appellant&#039;s cooperation in the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>