<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 243 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333223</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the additions made under section 68 for outstanding expenses payable to creditors were not sustainable as the amounts were for services rendered, not advances or loans. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee on this issue. The challenge to the validity of reopening proceedings was withdrawn and dismissed. General grounds raised in the appeal did not require adjudication, resulting in a partial allowance of the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 17:48:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 243 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333223</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the additions made under section 68 for outstanding expenses payable to creditors were not sustainable as the amounts were for services rendered, not advances or loans. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee on this issue. The challenge to the validity of reopening proceedings was withdrawn and dismissed. General grounds raised in the appeal did not require adjudication, resulting in a partial allowance of the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>