<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 567 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187065</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and CIT(A) that the commission paid to individuals by the assessee for the assessment year 1987-88 was a genuine business expenditure. The Court found no evidence to suggest that the Tribunal&#039;s findings were flawed, concluding that the commission paid to established persons in the export trade was legitimate and not related to the assessee-firm&#039;s partners. Therefore, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the commission was deductible as a valid business expense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 17:48:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 567 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187065</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and CIT(A) that the commission paid to individuals by the assessee for the assessment year 1987-88 was a genuine business expenditure. The Court found no evidence to suggest that the Tribunal&#039;s findings were flawed, concluding that the commission paid to established persons in the export trade was legitimate and not related to the assessee-firm&#039;s partners. Therefore, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the commission was deductible as a valid business expense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>