<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1495 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187062</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC directed the release of an imported car upon the petitioner furnishing a bond for the full value with a bank guarantee for the differential duty amount. The respondent agreed to comply if no stay order was obtained within two weeks. The petitioner later sought to withdraw the petition, which was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 17:21:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1495 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187062</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC directed the release of an imported car upon the petitioner furnishing a bond for the full value with a bank guarantee for the differential duty amount. The respondent agreed to comply if no stay order was obtained within two weeks. The petitioner later sought to withdraw the petition, which was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>