<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 897 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187058</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the addition of Rs. 8,41,079 for verification, deleting the addition of Rs. 4,13,500, and confirming the addition of Rs. 20,90,088 as unexplained cash credit under section 68. The Tribunal found that the lower authorities had not adequately verified the explanations provided by the assessee, leading to the varied outcomes in each case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 16:55:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 897 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187058</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the addition of Rs. 8,41,079 for verification, deleting the addition of Rs. 4,13,500, and confirming the addition of Rs. 20,90,088 as unexplained cash credit under section 68. The Tribunal found that the lower authorities had not adequately verified the explanations provided by the assessee, leading to the varied outcomes in each case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>