https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187054 The Supreme Court declined to interfere with an ad-interim order in a case concerning investor protection, directing the High Court to conduct day-to-day hearings without adjournments. SEBI and ROC were ordered to file counter affidavits, with SEBI permitted to conduct an inquiry and obtain investor names from Respondent No.1. The Court emphasized expeditious resolution without expressing any opinion on the case's merits. The Respondent agreed to cooperate with SEBI, subject to pending matters. The special leave petition was disposed of, urging the High Court to promptly decide the issue. en-us Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Oct 2016 15:32:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187054 The Supreme Court declined to interfere with an ad-interim order in a case concerning investor protection, directing the High Court to conduct day-to-day hearings without adjournments. SEBI and ROC were ordered to file counter affidavits, with SEBI permitted to conduct an inquiry and obtain investor names from Respondent No.1. The Court emphasized expeditious resolution without expressing any opinion on the case's merits. The Respondent agreed to cooperate with SEBI, subject to pending matters. The special leave petition was disposed of, urging the High Court to promptly decide the issue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187054