<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 432 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187044</link>
    <description>Sales tax exemption for rayon or artificial silk fabrics did not extend to H.D.P.E. fabrics because the notification treated them as a distinct class based on raw material and end use. The exclusion was upheld as a reasonable fiscal classification, since taxation laws allow wide legislative discretion if the distinction has a rational nexus with the object of the scheme. H.D.P.E. fabrics were mainly used for packing materials, sacks and bags rather than human clothing, and the exclusion was consistent with the treatment of other non-clothing fabrics such as hessian, jute cloth and P.V.C. fabrics. The denial of exemption was therefore not violative of Article 14.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 13:05:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 432 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187044</link>
      <description>Sales tax exemption for rayon or artificial silk fabrics did not extend to H.D.P.E. fabrics because the notification treated them as a distinct class based on raw material and end use. The exclusion was upheld as a reasonable fiscal classification, since taxation laws allow wide legislative discretion if the distinction has a rational nexus with the object of the scheme. H.D.P.E. fabrics were mainly used for packing materials, sacks and bags rather than human clothing, and the exclusion was consistent with the treatment of other non-clothing fabrics such as hessian, jute cloth and P.V.C. fabrics. The denial of exemption was therefore not violative of Article 14.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>