<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 1027 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187039</link>
    <description>The SC held that a court cannot invalidate a policy relaxation on grounds not pleaded where the challenge is confined to its application, not its validity. It further upheld the Government&#039;s relaxation dispensing with postgraduate qualification for teachers with 18 years&#039; service, treating long experience as a rational policy basis for granting selection-scale benefits. The High Court had therefore gone beyond the pleadings in testing the circular itself. The appeal succeeded, the High Court&#039;s order was set aside, and the administrative order rejecting the teacher&#039;s claim was restored, with amounts already paid protected from recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 12:27:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 1027 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187039</link>
      <description>The SC held that a court cannot invalidate a policy relaxation on grounds not pleaded where the challenge is confined to its application, not its validity. It further upheld the Government&#039;s relaxation dispensing with postgraduate qualification for teachers with 18 years&#039; service, treating long experience as a rational policy basis for granting selection-scale benefits. The High Court had therefore gone beyond the pleadings in testing the circular itself. The appeal succeeded, the High Court&#039;s order was set aside, and the administrative order rejecting the teacher&#039;s claim was restored, with amounts already paid protected from recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>