<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1478 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187031</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the condonation of delay application in the case due to insufficient explanation for the prolonged delay in filing the appeal. Despite citing precedents where delays were condoned, the Tribunal found the circumstances in this case did not warrant similar treatment. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 10:16:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1478 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187031</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the condonation of delay application in the case due to insufficient explanation for the prolonged delay in filing the appeal. Despite citing precedents where delays were condoned, the Tribunal found the circumstances in this case did not warrant similar treatment. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>