https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187020 A disciplinary challenge based on an allegedly vague charge-sheet failed where the employee replied without objection and participated throughout the enquiry; contemporaneous participation without demur barred a later plea of vagueness. Non-furnishing of the enquiry report did not invalidate the action because breach of natural justice required proof of prejudice, and none was shown to have affected the defence or appeal. Termination of a probationer was also sustained because probationary service does not attract the same opportunity requirements as confirmed service, and the misconduct was treated as serious enough to support the disciplinary action. en-us Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Oct 2016 17:05:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187020 A disciplinary challenge based on an allegedly vague charge-sheet failed where the employee replied without objection and participated throughout the enquiry; contemporaneous participation without demur barred a later plea of vagueness. Non-furnishing of the enquiry report did not invalidate the action because breach of natural justice required proof of prejudice, and none was shown to have affected the defence or appeal. Termination of a probationer was also sustained because probationary service does not attract the same opportunity requirements as confirmed service, and the misconduct was treated as serious enough to support the disciplinary action. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187020