https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187019 In a land acquisition compensation dispute, the Supreme Court held that a first appellate court should ordinarily reappraise the existing record and decide the matter on merits where the evidence has already been evaluated by the Reference Court. Remand was improper because the High Court's reasons were factually unsupported: the Reference Court had considered the exemplars relied on and had declined to act on them only because they were not proved on record. The High Court's order directing fresh determination of market value could not stand, and the matter was sent back for fresh decision of the pending appeals and cross-appeals on the existing record. en-us Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Oct 2016 16:55:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187019 In a land acquisition compensation dispute, the Supreme Court held that a first appellate court should ordinarily reappraise the existing record and decide the matter on merits where the evidence has already been evaluated by the Reference Court. Remand was improper because the High Court's reasons were factually unsupported: the Reference Court had considered the exemplars relied on and had declined to act on them only because they were not proved on record. The High Court's order directing fresh determination of market value could not stand, and the matter was sent back for fresh decision of the pending appeals and cross-appeals on the existing record. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187019