https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187016 The appeal by the CIT, Haryana, Rohtak was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld findings on the defective notice, inconsistent valuation reports, inordinate delay, and lack of evidence for undervaluation, concluding that the acquisition proceedings were invalid. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs. en-us Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Oct 2016 16:41:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187016 The appeal by the CIT, Haryana, Rohtak was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld findings on the defective notice, inconsistent valuation reports, inordinate delay, and lack of evidence for undervaluation, concluding that the acquisition proceedings were invalid. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187016