<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 645 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187005</link>
    <description>In a central excise matter, the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the impugned decision and dismissed the civil appeal. No substantive legal reasoning was recorded in the order, so the operative effect is limited to the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 14:07:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 645 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187005</link>
      <description>In a central excise matter, the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the impugned decision and dismissed the civil appeal. No substantive legal reasoning was recorded in the order, so the operative effect is limited to the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>