<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1039 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186999</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD granted the stay petition in a case concerning a penalty under section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 due to lack of proper notice and defense. The Tribunal found that the appellant was not served with the show cause notice and was not provided with the order in original, denying the appellant the opportunity to respond or defend the case. Emphasizing the importance of principles of natural justice, the Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to provide all relevant documents to the appellant for a fair opportunity to respond within a specified timeline. The case was remanded for further proceedings, with no opinion given on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 12:57:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1039 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186999</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD granted the stay petition in a case concerning a penalty under section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 due to lack of proper notice and defense. The Tribunal found that the appellant was not served with the show cause notice and was not provided with the order in original, denying the appellant the opportunity to respond or defend the case. Emphasizing the importance of principles of natural justice, the Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to provide all relevant documents to the appellant for a fair opportunity to respond within a specified timeline. The case was remanded for further proceedings, with no opinion given on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>