https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186998 A claim for loss and damages was treated as arising under the original lease agreement, with the later arrangement operating only as an alternative method of working out contractual rights, so the constitutional objection based on section 122 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir failed. The machinery decree, however, was not supported by adequate proof: the claimant had not satisfactorily established the existence, value, or actual taking over of the machinery, and the award could not rest on conjecture or weakness in the defence. That part of the decree was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh determination on the machinery-related issues. en-us Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Oct 2016 12:40:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186998 A claim for loss and damages was treated as arising under the original lease agreement, with the later arrangement operating only as an alternative method of working out contractual rights, so the constitutional objection based on section 122 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir failed. The machinery decree, however, was not supported by adequate proof: the claimant had not satisfactorily established the existence, value, or actual taking over of the machinery, and the award could not rest on conjecture or weakness in the defence. That part of the decree was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh determination on the machinery-related issues. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186998