<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 234 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333214</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that consignment agents&#039; premises are part of the place of goods removal, entitling the appellant to cenvat credit on commission paid to consignment agents. Distinguishing between commission agents and consignment agents, the Tribunal set aside the denial of credit, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 12:30:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 234 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333214</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that consignment agents&#039; premises are part of the place of goods removal, entitling the appellant to cenvat credit on commission paid to consignment agents. Distinguishing between commission agents and consignment agents, the Tribunal set aside the denial of credit, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>